Photo of Christine  Anto

Christine Anto



DePaul University College of Law, J.D., 2001

Marquette University, B.A., 1997



It is not every day a judge apologizes to defense counsel in a written opinion, but in a motion Christine argued to reconsider an adverse ruling, that’s exactly what happened. Christine’s enthusiastic and dedicated advocacy on behalf of her clients allows her to achieve success in and out of the court room every day.

Christine looks at the big picture when providing counsel to her clients. She is dedicated to giving practical and economical advice. As chair of the firm’s Insurance Services Practice Group and a member of the firm's Commercial Transportation Practice Group, she concentrates on personal, commercial and professional lines of insurance, as well as extra-contractual/bad faith claims.  She provides coverage opinions, negotiates coverage disputes and handles all aspects of litigation actions on behalf of insurance companies. She represents the interests of insurance companies, their employees and independent insurance agents.

In the transportation industry Christine counsels trucking companies and their insurers in negotiating coverage issues and litigating declaratory judgment actions.  She also provides counsel to clients with respect to contractual indemnification issues and represents the interests of parties in both seeking and contesting indemnification from others.  Her vast experience includes matters in the areas of automobile liability, uninsured and underinsured motorists, homeowners, professional liability, medical malpractice, construction, environmental and toxic tort.

In her free time Christine travels to and explores new places with her husband and their two sons.

Memberships & Involvement

  • Member: Chicago Bar Association; American Bar Association


  • Successfully litigated application of indemnity provisions in Uniform Intermodal Interchange Agreement resulting in transfer of approximately half a million dollars in defense costs
  • Received summary judgment from Indiana federal court that a class action lawsuit alleging that insured debt adjustment services operation targeted financially troubled customers and extracted fees for worthless services did not fall within coverage for personal injury, accidental event, or advertising injury
  • Received summary judgment finding that delivery service client qualified as an additional insured under its driver's automobile policy
  • Successfully brought subrogation and contribution claim on behalf of insurer for motor carrier whose placards were on a vehicle against insurer for driver and owner of vehicle where there were alternative allegations that driver was acting both on behalf of motor carrier and owner which triggered a duty to defend by owner/driver's insurer. Owner/driver's insurer failed to defend, court found it to be stopped and liable for 100% of defense and indemnity.
  • Participated in the successful settlement of a high exposure trucking accident involving multiple layers of insurance coverage, contractual risk transfer issues, and conflict of interest issues
  • Received summary judgment for insurance company on six figure claim by arguing that vehicle was not owned, hired, or borrowed by the named insured, overcoming arguments as to agency
  • Received appellate court affirmation of summary judgment finding that property damage coverage does not apply to TCPA claim, in a favorable decision for the insurance company client that limited available coverage by millions of dollars
  • Successfully argued before the 5th District Appellate Court of Illinois that uninsured motorist limits could not be stacked 
  • Granted summary judgment in favor of an insurance client that a fight and alleged torture at a college campus resulted in foreseeable injuries that were not covered under a homeowners policy
  • Successfully argued on summary judgment that underinsured motorist coverage was not available where alleged injury occurred away from the insured vehicle



  • USLAW DigiKnow, January 15, 2016
  • Defense Counsel as Ethically Challenged or Merely in a Position where Appearance of Impropriety Exists when Insurer and Insured have Conflicts of Interest?
    IDC Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 2, 2012

Presentations & Events

  • USLAW Network, Webcast, September 30, 2020 - October 9, 2020
  • USLAW Network, Webcast, July 9, 2020
  • Auto Risk Management Seminar: Legal Implications and Risk Management of Telematics, Distracted Driving and Hired Non Owned Autos
    Client Seminar; Chicago, IL, October 10, 2018
  • Trucking Coverage 101
    USLAW Trucking Boot Camp, August 2018
  • Taking Initiative: Paving Your Path To Success
    USLAW Women’s Connection, June 2018
  • Insurance Coverage Issues – Five Minute Drill
    USLAW Spring Conference, April 2018
  • UIM and TBI Claims
    Client Presentation; Chicago, IL, September 7, 2017
  • Stafford; Webinar, July 12, 2017
  • Risk Mitigation, Insurance, SIRs and the Evolving Market
    USLAW Spring Conference, April 2017
  • USLAW Network Risk Management Exchange
    November 2016
  • Ethical Conflicts of Interest: Illinois, Indiana, Missouri and Wisconsin
    Client Seminar, November 7, 2016
  • Insurance Issues in Trucking Litigation
    Client Seminar, Brookfield, WI, July 7, 2015
  • Passing the Buck: Tips on How to Get the Quickest and Most Effective Risk Transfer (A Top Ten List) 
    Sedona, AZ, May 2, 2015