About Us
Firm Profile
Mission Statement
Office Locations
iSAlawus
Alternative Fees
Technology
Brochure
USLAW
Professional Affiliations
Our People
Attorneys & Para-Professionals
Our Administrative Leaders
Practice Areas
Litigation
Corporate
Industries
Diversity
Mission Statement
Partners Committee on Diversity
SmithAmundsen Scholarship
Recent Initiatives
Publications, News, & Events
Newsletters & Alerts
Aerospace Alerts
Case Reports
Class Action Alerts
Construction Law Alerts
Labor & Employment Law Alerts
Financial Services Quarterly
Health Care Law Alerts
Insurance Law Alerts
School Law Alerts
Sports Law Alerts
St. Louis Law Alerts
Transportation Law Alerts
Wisconsin Law Quarterly
Press Releases
Publications
Seminars & Events
Firm News
Careers
Attorneys
Summer Associate Program
Paralegals
Administrative Professionals
Administrative Assistants
Benefits
Hiring Practices
Attorney Development
Contact Us
Search:
Publications
Newsletters & Alerts
Aerospace Alerts
Case Reports
Class Action Alerts
Construction Law Alerts
Labor & Employment Law Alerts
Financial Services Quarterly
Health Care Law Alerts
Insurance Law Alerts
School Law Alerts
Sports Law Alerts
St. Louis Law Alerts
Transportation Law Alerts
Wisconsin Law Quarterly
Press Releases
Publications
Seminars & Events
Firm News
Timothy Liam Epstein
, Chair of SmithAmundsen's
Sports Law Practice Group
, will publish his latest law review article with the University of Texas (UT-Austin). "Prep Plus: Evaluating the Motivations for and Effects of Enrollment Multipliers and other Measures in High School Sports" will appear in the Spring issue of the Texas Review of Entertainment and Sports Law.
Click here for a copy of the article.
The competitive balance between public and private high school sports teams is a focus of debate for many athletic associations in the United States. The question that often arises is: “Is it fair for private schools, with their ability to enroll student-athletes outside of their geographic boundaries, to take home more than their proportionate share of state championships?” This article examines state high school athletic associations’ pursuit of creating a level playing field by implementing controversial enrollment multipliers for playoff classification. Through a multi-state case study, this article examines the use of multipliers and similar measures and the controversy generated by the same, as multipliers may not be a solution to allegations of “unfair competition,” and, further, may not pass legal muster. This article provides analysis from a legal standpoint for the benefit of sports administrators, coaches, athletes, and sports law practitioners on a widely-used, yet controversial attempt to achieve competitive balance in high school sports.
"Prep Plus" will mark Tim's third law review publication to go along with his contributions to the University of Virginia, the University of Illinois, Sports Litigation Alert, the Chicago Bar Association, DRI, Legal Issues in Collegiate Athletics, USA Today, Crain's Chicago Business, the Sports Business Journal, and the Sports Law Blog.
URL: /news.aspx?gid=32&pid=12&cid=382