About Us
Firm Profile
Mission Statement
Office Locations
iSAlawus
Alternative Fees
Technology
Brochure
USLAW
Professional Affiliations
Our People
Attorneys & Para-Professionals
Our Administrative Leaders
Practice Areas
Litigation
Corporate
Industries
Diversity
Mission Statement
Diversity Task Force
SmithAmundsen Scholarship
Recent Initiatives
Publications, News, & Events
Newsletters & Alerts
Aerospace Alerts
Case Reports
Class Action Alerts
Construction Law Alerts
Labor & Employment Law Alerts
Financial Services Quarterly
Health Care Law Alerts
Insurance Law Alerts
School Law Alerts
Sports Law Alerts
Transportation Law Alerts
Wisconsin Law Quarterly
Press Releases
Publications
Seminars & Events
Firm News
Careers
Attorneys
Summer Associate Program
Paralegals
Administrative Professionals
Administrative Assistants
Benefits
Hiring Practices
Attorney Development
Contact Us
Search:
Class Action Alerts
Newsletters & Alerts
Aerospace Alerts
Case Reports
Class Action Alerts
Construction Law Alerts
Labor & Employment Law Alerts
Financial Services Quarterly
Health Care Law Alerts
Insurance Law Alerts
School Law Alerts
Sports Law Alerts
Transportation Law Alerts
Wisconsin Law Quarterly
Press Releases
Publications
Seminars & Events
Firm News
Alert: Recent Seventh Circuit Decisions May Signal Heightened Scrutiny Under Adequacy Prong
Written by:
Eric L.Samore
December 14, 2011
SmithAmundsen's class action team recently secured a significant victory from the Seventh Circuit, raising the bar that plaintiff counsel must clear in order to satisfy the adequacy requirement for class certification. In an opinion authored by Judge Posner, the court vacated class certification in
Creative Montessori Learning Centers v. Ashford Gear
, No. 11-8020 (7th Cir. Nov. 22, 2011),
because class counsel are fiduciaries of the class. Any serious doubts about their ability to loyally represent the interests of the class requires a denial of class certification. Judge Posner took issue with the district court’s holding that only the most egregious conduct by class counsel “could ever arguably justify denial of class status,” stating that such a ruling “would if taken literally condone, and by condoning invite, unethical conduct.” Usually adequacy of counsel is not contested at class certification hearings. Defense counsel ordinarily argues other defenses such as predominance.
The significance of this opinion was highlighted in an article by BNA Class Action Litigation Report titled, “
Recent Seventh Circuit Decisions May Signal Heightened Scrutiny Under Adequacy Prong.
"
Reproduced with permission from Class Action Litigation Report, 12 CLASS 1149 (Dec. 9, 2011).
Copyright 2011 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033)
http://www.bna.com
.
URL: /news.aspx?pid=13&gid=165&cid=1066